Skip to content

COMPANION RESOURCE · SEPTEMBER 2026

Beyond AI Adoption

Redesigning Work, Judgment, and Accountability

AI has expanded what technology can do. But adoption is not transformation, productivity is not automatically value, and a better model does not automatically create better work.

Presentation version: September 2026

THE QUESTION

Did The Way We Work Change?

THE CENTRAL IDEA

Adoption is a metric. Not an outcome.

Adoption tells us whether people used the technology. Transformation tells us whether the work, decisions, and outcomes actually changed.

The real progression is not a login, a license, or a prompt count. It is the movement from activity to value:

Usage

Behavior change

Workflow change

Operational outcome

Value and impact

AI changes what is technically possible. It does not eliminate the need to understand the problem, redesign the work, assign accountability, measure outcomes, and learn from reality.

PRACTICAL FRAMEWORKS

Use the questions to redesign the work.

WORK-AI FIT TEST

Where does AI belong in the workflow?

AI performance depends on the task, the worker, the context, the workflow, the system, and the consequences of being wrong. Use these questions before calling a task AI-ready.

  1. 01Is the output objectively verifiable?
  2. 02What happens when it is wrong?
  3. 03How much hidden context does the human already possess?
  4. 04Is this task inside or outside the model's demonstrated capability frontier?
  5. 05Does AI improve the work, or merely add another interaction?

The capability frontier moves as models, retrieval, context, tooling, and workflow design improve. Retest assumptions over time.

MONDAY MORNING AI TEST

Is the initiative changing how we work to create measurable incremental value?

Use this check in product reviews, transformation meetings, roadmap discussions, and leadership reviews when an AI initiative is consuming meaningful time or attention.

  1. 01What measurable outcome should change?
  2. 02What work or behavior has to change for that outcome to move?
  3. 03What should become unnecessary, automated, improved, or newly possible?
  4. 04Where does consequence require human judgment?
  5. 05How will the system know whether it worked?

Did how you work change? Or just the tools?

RESEARCH & CITATIONS

The task, population, and context matter.

There is no universal “AI productivity” number.

The studies below examine different populations, tasks, models, time periods, and work environments. They should not be treated as directly comparable estimates of one universal effect.

The contrast is the point: AI impact depends on the work and the context.

McKinsey & Company: The State of AI in 2026

The survey behind the slide's approximately 9 in 10 adoption figure, 8 in 10 productivity figure, and approximately 4 in 10 enterprise financial contribution figure.

Open source

GitHub Copilot controlled experiment

Developers completed the standardized JavaScript task 55.8% faster with Copilot in this controlled task and population.

Open source

METR randomized developer study

Experienced open-source developers working on real issues in mature codebases took 19% longer in the early-2025 study.

Open source

METR experiment design update

A later update explains why selection effects made the follow-up data unreliable for estimating current productivity effects.

Open source

Dell'Acqua et al.: The Jagged Technological Frontier

The research behind the task-dependent frontier described in the deck, including faster inside-frontier work and weaker performance on the selected outside-frontier task.

Open source

NIST AI Risk Management Framework

A voluntary, use-case-agnostic framework for managing AI risks across design, development, deployment, use, and evaluation.

Open source

NIST Generative AI Profile

A companion resource focused on risks that are novel to or intensified by generative AI.

Open source

European Union AI Act

A risk-based regulatory example of governance obligations scaling with the use and potential consequence of AI.

Open source

GOVERNANCE

Not all AI risk is equal.

Impact increases, reversibility decreases, uncertainty increases: governance should get stronger.

This is Ashish Sharma's practitioner shorthand, informed by risk-proportionate approaches in established AI governance frameworks. It is not presented as a formula from NIST or the EU AI Act.

Low consequence

Baseline controls

  • Access control
  • Ownership
  • Basic logging
  • Normal product review

Material consequence

Active monitoring

  • Evaluation thresholds
  • Quality monitoring
  • Exception queues
  • Escalation rules

High consequence

Hard boundaries

  • Pre-action approval
  • Programmatic fail-safes
  • Independent testing
  • Audit and rollback

QUESTIONS THAT LAST

AI changed the tech. Not the questions.

The tech

  • •Context windows
  • •Token optimization
  • •Vector embeddings
  • •Model drift
  • •System prompts
  • •MCP / A2A
  • •Agent registries
  • •Model benchmarks

The work

  • •What problem are we solving? For whom?
  • •What behavior or workflow must change?

The accountability

  • •What outcome should move?
  • •What must not get worse?
  • •How will we know it worked?

QUICK ANSWERS

Questions from the talk.

What does Beyond AI Adoption mean?

AI adoption measures whether people are using a technology. Moving beyond adoption means determining whether the technology changes how work is performed, how decisions are made, where human judgment is applied, and whether measurable operational, customer, or business outcomes improve.

Why is AI adoption not the same as AI value?

Adoption measures use. Value requires evidence that behavior or workflows changed and that those changes produced measurable operational, customer, or financial outcomes.

What is the jagged technological frontier?

The jagged technological frontier describes how AI can perform extremely well on some tasks while performing poorly on seemingly adjacent tasks. The boundary is uneven and changes as models, tools, context, retrieval, and workflows improve.

What is the Work-AI Fit Test?

The Work-AI Fit Test is a five-question practitioner framework for evaluating whether a specific task or workflow is a good fit for AI and where human judgment should remain.

What is the Monday Morning AI Test?

The Monday Morning AI Test is a five-question framework for evaluating whether an AI initiative is producing real transformation rather than merely adoption or activity.

How should organizations govern AI risk?

Governance should scale with consequence. As potential impact increases, reversibility decreases, or uncertainty rises, controls should become stronger.

ABOUT ASHISH SHARMA

The work after the talk.

Ashish Sharma is a technology and product leader focused on artificial intelligence, decision intelligence, product strategy, and the organizational realities of putting AI into production.

He writes about the practical challenges of implementing AI, from workflow redesign and adoption to governance, economics, accountability, and the human consequences of technological change.

TAKE IT WITH YOU

Did The Way We Work Change?

Download the deck

The Work-AI Fit Test, Monday Morning AI Test, and practitioner governance shorthand are frameworks developed for this presentation by Ashish Sharma. External research findings are attributed and linked to their original sources.